NPL reduction still a major concern By Zhao Renfeng (China Business Weekly) Updated: 2004-08-26 15:31
Editor's note: Experts widely agree the development of China's financial and
banking sector has lagged behind the general development of the nation's
economy. The government's recent steps to shore up the competitive edge of
China's banks have been bold and resolute. China Business Weekly staff reporter
ZHAO RENFENG recently interviewed Wei S Yen, Moody's managing-director in
Asia-Pacific, regarding his views of the future landscape of the nation's
banking industry.
China Business Weekly (CBW): China's recent bank reform has resulted in
significant changes on the nation's banking industry. What is Moody's outlook
for China's banks, particularly the Big Four banks?
Wei Yen (Yen): Moody's holds stable outlooks for China's banking industry.
Although some banks still face major challenges in improving profitability,
widening financing channels and shrugging off their heavy historical legacies of
bad loans, the government's firm support is likely to give the banks a shot in
the arm.
We have found China's State-owned banks are resolute in their efforts to
getting rid of bad loans and improving capital ratios, which will aid their
future overseas listings.
CBW: China's banking reform deepened recently, when State-owned banks sped up
their efforts to list overseas. What is your assessment of the banks'
preparations for overseas listings? What has been their major progress so far,
and what issues matter most during the critical market-oriented reform of
China's State-owned banks?
Yen: We have found that China's State-owned banks have largely improved their
profitability through their own efforts. Also, the government's resolveis
conspicuous in helping them reduce non-performing loans (NPLs) and raise their
capital ratios.
These banks have done a good job in improving their balance sheets. You may
find rapid drops in their NPL ratios. The key next step, for them, is to build
up healthy and sustainable business models, which can make the banks stand out
in the market.
CBW: Under the current circumstances, banks are finding it hard to
differentiate themselves from their competitors, due to the fixed-interest-rate
policy and their limitations in product innovation. How can China's banks
outperform their competitors?
Yen: Right, there are currently many policy restrictions in China's banking
industry. But these policies will be loosened some day in the future. Chinese
bankers need to think about what to do next, and they should start to prepare
for the future right now.
There is great potential for China's banks, particularly those involved with
retail businesses and intermediary businesses.
CBW: What is the role of bank finance in China's economic development? Yen:
Credit-funded investments are behind much of China's rapid economic development,
and, in 2003, the banks provided 85 per cent of all funds raised.
The strength of their deposit base -- spurred by foreign direct investment
inflows and a rise in money supply -- is a key reason for the aggressive
lending. It should be noted loan prices are controlled and, thus, do not always
reflect the inherent credit risks, given that risk-management systems are still
elementary.
Another detail to consider in this context is most corporate borrowers are
manufacturers, and the recent rise in raw material prices has squeezed their
margins. The banks do not have much flexibility in the way they can deal with
non-performing loans (NPLs), but they are under pressure to reduce them.
They can't sell NPLs directly to investors because discounting NPLs is
prohibited. So, the only option is to grow their loan portfolios, or in other
words, to inflate the denominator used to calculate NPL ratios.
Another reason loan growth is difficult to slow down is branch managers are
faced with having to perform in accordance with operating targets that are
growth-oriented.
CBW: Given the difficulties in slowing loan growth, what options are open to
authorities to put the brakes on excessive economic expansion?
Yen: Strong regulatory and administrative measures are really the best
options, because market forces are not that powerful in China. The People's Bank
of China has tightened guidelines for lending to the real estate sector since
June 2003, and has introduced steps to remove liquidity from the system, such as
raising the deposit reserve requirement from 6 per cent last fall to 7.5 per
cent now.
The China Banking Regulatory Commission also introduced its own initiatives,
including a set of new capital adequacy requirements that will slow lending,
especially for the 11 shareholding banks.
CBW: How effective have these measures been? What kinds of banks bear the
brunt of these measures?
Yen: Basically, the government is aiming to slow economic growth by reining
in bank lending, by stimulating loans to the small and medium-sized enterprise
(SME) sector, and by strengthening the supervision of poorly capitalized banks.
Against this backdrop, the results have been mixed. This is due to the failure
to reform other critical areas, such as the interest rate regime and the
difficulties in changing bank operating targets from those based on growth to
profitability.
Furthermore, local governments will continue exerting their influence on
loans for particular pet projects with questionable economic benefits. A sharp
slowdown in loan growth can lead to asset quality and liquidity problems for the
banks -- in particular, the smaller and fast-growing shareholding and city
commercial banks. These banks could be in the unenviable position of having to
simultaneously handle a decline in earnings, a rise in NPLs, and tougher access
to capital markets. The impact of the current restrictions will be felt most on
the poorly run banks, or those which must grow their assets and earnings fast,
as they position themselves to meet the challenges posed by the World Trade
Organization.
To maintain earnings, against the backdrop of slowing growth, the banks must
target higher-yielding assets, such as SME loans.
This could lead the banks to take on more risks, but they would also be doing
so without very good mechanisms to quantify such risks, and to price their loans
accordingly. Furthermore, SME loan growth is expected to be anemic, and when
loans are made to the sector, they most likely will not be priced to reflect the
inherent risks. The result will be an increase in asset-quality risk at the
banks.